second appeal substantial question of law

This Supreme Court judgment addresses whether the plaintiff (Jagir Kaur) successfully proved ownership of the disputed land. The Court held that the findings of the First Appellate Court, which denied relief due to lack of credible evidence, were correct and ought not to have been interfered with by the High Court in second appeal. The High Court had erred in reversing findings of fact without identifying any perversity or substantial question of law. This case reinforces judicial discipline in second appellate jurisdiction under Section 100 of CPC.